From the Lab to Market Leadership — Part 2: The Challenges of Expectation Management

In the fast-paced world of innovation, the expectations of potential users play a crucial role in the success of new technologies. The acceptance and use of innovations largely depend on how well these expectations are met. Therefore, it is essential for companies to understand the dynamics of user expectations and respond strategically. Two key concepts provide valuable insights in this regard: Geoffrey Moore’s ‘Crossing the Chasm’ and the Gartner Hype Cycle.

Moore describes the challenge of bridging the gap between early adopters and the early majority. The Gartner Hype Cycle, on the other hand, illustrates the typical phases new technologies go through — from initial euphoria to disillusionment, and finally to widespread acceptance and productivity.

Credits: Annie Spratt via Unsplash

The goal of this article is to provide a deeper analysis of how the expectations of potential users influence the innovation market and the strategic implications for companies. By shedding light on the phases of the Gartner Hype Cycle and applying the ‘Crossing the Chasm’ model, companies can better shape and implement their innovation strategies.

In the first part of our article series, ‘From the Lab to Market Launch: The Challenges of the Innovator’s Dilemma’, we explored the difficulties that deep tech startups face when launching new technologies. We discussed how these startups must not only advance their innovative approaches but also understand and address the concerns and priorities of their stakeholders. The right timing of the market launch and the importance of clear communication and success stories were central themes for gaining the trust of investors and partners.

These insights form the foundation for our in-depth analysis in this part of the series. We will now examine how the expectations of potential users and the phases of the Gartner Hype Cycle interact and what strategic measures companies can take to maximize the success of their innovations.

The Driving Force Behind Early Technologies: Crossing the Chasm by Geoffrey M. Moore

Geoffrey M. Moore’s ‘Crossing the Chasm’ is a groundbreaking concept that describes the challenges of introducing innovative technologies to the mass market. The core of the model deals with the difficulty of bridging the gap — the so-called chasm — between early adopters and the early majority. This gap is often the critical point where many innovations fail.

The Five Customer Segments

Moore categorizes the market for new technologies into five different customer segments, each with unique needs and expectations:

1. Innovators: This group consists of tech-savvy enthusiasts willing to take risks to try the latest technologies. They are open to immature products and often provide valuable feedback for further development.
2. Early Adopters: These visionaries recognize the potential of a new technology early and are willing to invest in it to gain a competitive advantage. They are less price-sensitive and willing to pay for innovative solutions that meet their needs.
3. Early Majority: This pragmatic group waits for technologies to mature and prove themselves before making a purchase decision. They want to ensure that the technology is reliable and effective and often rely on recommendations and references.
4. Late Majority: These conservative users are more skeptical of new technologies and adopt innovations only when they have become standard and widely accepted. They value cost-efficiency and ease of use.
5. Laggards: This group is traditional and technology-averse. They only resort to new technologies when there is no other option or the old solutions are no longer available.

Credits: Craig Chelius — CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5938404

The Challenge of the Early Majority: From Enthusiasm to Pragmatic Acceptance

The influence of the user expectations of early adopters and the early majority on the innovation process is fundamentally different, playing a special role in the market introduction of new technologies.

Early adopters are typically technology enthusiasts or companies willing to take risks to be the first to benefit from the advantages of a new technology. Their expectations are often high, and they are ready to deal with unfinished products and potential issues as long as the technology has the potential to bring about revolutionary changes. This user group is valuable for innovators as they provide early feedback and serve as the first source of revenue to finance further development cycles.

The early majority, on the other hand, is more cautious and requires solid evidence of the benefits and reliability of a new technology before deciding to invest. This group values references, stable performance, and comprehensive customer support. For them, new technologies must not only be innovative but also practical and reliable. They expect mature solutions that are easy to integrate and do not cause significant disruptions to existing systems and processes.

Challenges in Overcoming the Chasm

The main difficulty in overcoming the chasm between early adopters and the early majority lies in the differing requirements and expectations of these two groups. While early adopters are willing to live with imperfections, the early majority expects mature and proven products. Companies must therefore adjust their strategy to convince the early majority. This often requires:

1. Maturing the Technology: Products need to become mature, stable, and user-friendly to meet the demands of the early majority.
2. References and Success Stories: Collecting and publishing success stories and positive experiences from early adopters can build the trust of the early majority.
3. Enhanced Customer Support: A comprehensive support system must be in place to provide security and assistance to early majority customers.
4. Market Research and Adaptation: Detailed market research is necessary to understand the specific needs and concerns of the early majority and adjust the product accordingly.

Strategies for Overcoming the Chasm

To successfully cross the chasm between early adopters and the early majority, companies must employ targeted strategies. The transition from the innovative, risk-taking early adopters to the more pragmatic and conservative early majority users requires careful planning and execution. Some proven strategies to bridge the gap include:

1. Focus on Niche Markets: Companies can initially focus on smaller, specific niche markets that have similar needs and requirements to the early majority.
2. Pilot Projects: Pilot projects and trials with potential early majority customers can provide valuable feedback and serve as references for others.
3. Partnerships and Alliances: Collaborating with established companies can help build trust and facilitate access to the early majority.

The following case studies provide insights into the challenges and strategies needed to overcome the chasm between early adopters and the early majority:

• Successful Example: Planet Labs
  Planet Labs, a company in the NewSpace sector, illustrates successful chasm crossing. Planet Labs started with the idea of developing small, cost-effective satellites capable of providing high-resolution images of the Earth daily. Early adopters, mainly research institutions and environmental organizations, saw immense value in the ability to monitor changes on Earth in near real-time. However, Planet Labs also managed to convince the early majority, including governments and commercial customers in agriculture and logistics. By continually improving image quality, expanding the satellite constellation, and offering tailored solutions for various industries, Planet Labs bridged the gap and built a broad customer base. The key to success was clearly communicating the benefits and practical applications of their technology for different sectors.
• Failed Example: Proteus Digital Health
  Proteus Digital Health, an innovator in the healthcare sector, exemplifies a company that failed to bridge the chasm. The company developed a “digital pill” that used sensors to collect data on medication intake and transmit it to a mobile device. Initially, Proteus attracted visionary investors and early adopters in the medical research field who saw the potential to improve patient compliance. Despite the initial hype and significant partnerships with major pharmaceutical companies, Proteus failed to convince the early majority, consisting of healthcare providers and patients. Concerns about data privacy, high costs, and the complexity of the technology prevented widespread acceptance. Additionally, there was a lack of convincing clinical evidence demonstrating the practical benefits of the technology in everyday life. Ultimately, Proteus could not build the necessary credibility and trust to bridge the chasm and failed to establish its innovation in the market.

Strategic Implications for Founders: Adapting Marketing, Sales, and Product Development

For founders and entrepreneurs aiming to successfully transition from early adopters to the early majority, adjustments in marketing, sales, and product development are particularly crucial.

From Hype to Reality: Effective Sales Approaches for the Early Majority

While early adopters are often excited by the novelty and potential of a technology, the early majority needs concrete evidence of the product’s benefits and reliability. This means that marketing and sales strategies must be adjusted accordingly:

• Market-Oriented Communication: Communication should focus more on the practical benefits and proven value of the product. Success stories and testimonials from existing customers can be very effective here.
• Security and Trust: To gain the trust of the early majority, marketing messages should highlight aspects such as security, stability, and support.
• Targeted Campaigns: Marketing campaigns should be specifically tailored to the needs and concerns of the early majority. This could mean focusing on certain industries or user groups that particularly benefit from the new technology.

User-Driven Design: How Feedback Drives Product Development

Product development must be flexible and adaptable to meet the expectations of the early majority. User feedback plays a central role:

• Iterative Improvement: Based on the feedback from early adopters, products can be iteratively improved to better meet the requirements and expectations of the early majority.
• Usability: The early majority places great importance on usability and seamless integration into existing systems. Products should therefore be designed to be easy to implement and use.
• Support and Training: To facilitate the transition, companies should offer extensive support and training programs. This not only helps with product acceptance but also builds trust and satisfaction.

Building Lasting Customer Relationships

The early majority tends to build long-term relationships with providers that are reliable and consistently deliver value. Therefore, companies should ensure excellent customer service and continuously seek ways to improve their products and services.

By adapting marketing and sales strategies as well as product development to the needs and expectations of the early majority, founders and companies can successfully bridge the chasm and bring their innovations to a broad market.

From Hype to Maturity: Navigating the Gartner Hype Cycle

The Gartner Hype Cycle is a well-known model that describes the maturity, acceptance, and application of new technologies over time. It helps companies better understand technological progress and the associated market opportunities. These phases are significant not only for understanding technological maturity but also for market acceptance and user expectations.

https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/what-s-new-in-the-2023-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies

The model outlines five main phases that a technology goes through during its development and introduction. It highlights how technologies move from initial excitement through the peak of inflated expectations and the trough of disillusionment to stable productivity.

1. Technology Trigger:
   This phase marks the beginning of a new technology or innovation surge. A technological breakthrough or new development draws attention, generating interest in the industry and media. Expectations are high at this stage, but there are no real products or marketable solutions yet.
   Similar to the “Innovators” in Moore’s model, it is primarily visionary early adopters who recognize the potential of the technology in this phase. The Innovator’s Dilemma appears here, presenting the challenge of whether and how strongly to invest in this still immature technology.
2. Peak of Inflated Expectations:
   Initial excitement and media coverage often raise expectations to an unrealistic level. Many companies jump on the bandwagon, anticipating significant successes and revolutions. However, many technological hurdles remain to be overcome.
   This phase can be amplified by the expectations of Moore’s early adopters, who want to see quick successes. Companies face the decision to continue investing to meet these expectations or to be cautious to minimize risk.
3. Trough of Disillusionment:
   When the technology fails to meet high expectations immediately, a phase of disenchantment sets in. Many projects fail, and public enthusiasm wanes. The technology now needs to prove itself and find practical applications to regain trust.
   Here, the chasm between early adopters and the early majority becomes apparent. Companies must develop strategies to overcome the skepticism of the early majority and bring the product to the mass market.
4. Slope of Enlightenment:
   After disillusionment, a gradual rediscovery of the technology begins. Realistic use cases are identified, and successful pilot projects strengthen trust. Companies and investors start to recognize how the technology can be profitably used.
   This phase requires adapting marketing and sales strategies and focusing more on the needs of the early majority. Companies that successfully cross the chasm can benefit from insights and user feedback.
5. Plateau of Productivity:
   In this final phase, the technology is broadly accepted and productively used. There are now many examples of successful applications, and the technology is seen as mature and stable. The market reaches a certain maturity, and the initial challenges are overcome.
   Technologies that reach this phase have crossed the chasm and are firmly established in the market. Companies can now benefit from stable revenue streams and solidify their market leadership.

Case Studies from the DeepTech Sector: Illustrating the Dynamics of the Hype Cycle

The following examples illustrate how the phases of the Gartner Hype Cycle can influence the dynamics and challenges of DeepTech innovations and what strategic decisions companies need to make to be successful.

• Peak of Inflated Expectations: Example from the NewSpace Sector
  A prominent example from the NewSpace sector is Virgin Galactic. The vision of commercial space flights initially sparked great enthusiasm and high expectations. Significant investments were made, and media presence was enormous. However, technological challenges and delays led to disappointments and skepticism, typical of the Peak of Inflated Expectations.
• Trough of Disillusionment: Example from the Healthcare Sector
  A current example from the healthcare sector is the development of wearable health tech, especially devices for continuous health data monitoring. Companies like Fitbit experienced initial excitement, followed by a phase of disenchantment when the technology did not immediately deliver the expected revolutionary health improvements. These devices are now in the Trough of Disillusionment, where they need to prove themselves through improved accuracy and useful applications.
• Slope of Enlightenment: Advances in Quantum Medicine
  In the field of quantum medicine, a sub-discipline of quantum computing, we are currently seeing the Slope of Enlightenment. After initial skepticism and high expectations, the first practical applications and research successes are beginning to strengthen confidence in this technology. Companies that continue to invest in this phase have the opportunity to benefit from growing insights and increasing market acceptance.

Strategic Implications of the Hype Cycle for Companies

In the early phases of the Hype Cycle, particularly in the Technology Trigger and Peak of Inflated Expectations, companies face the challenge of finding the right balance between engagement and risk management. Early engagement can bring significant advantages, including competitive edge and the opportunity to shape the technology. However, companies must balance this with effective risk management. One strategy is to initiate pilot projects and test in controlled environments to gain valuable insights and minimize potential risks. Investments should be gradual and milestone-based to reduce the risk of inflated expectations and failures.

Managing expectations is a central challenge when dealing with the Hype Cycle. Companies must ensure that internal and external stakeholders have realistic expectations about the performance and market readiness of new technologies. This requires transparent communication and continuous education about the actual capabilities and development stages of the technology. It is essential to maintain a realistic perspective and avoid raising excessive expectations that may lead to later disappointments. By providing clear, fact-based information and showcasing development progress, companies can secure stakeholders’ trust and support.

To successfully navigate through the Trough of Disillusionment, continuous improvements and user feedback are essential. Companies should implement iterative development processes where user feedback is regularly collected and integrated into product development. This enables them to address the actual needs and requirements of users and continuously optimize the technology. Direct interaction with users can also provide valuable insights into market demands and help increase product acceptance.

In the later phases of the Hype Cycle, particularly on the Slope of Enlightenment and Plateau of Productivity, the focus is on scaling and sustainable productivity improvement. Companies must ensure that the technology is scalable and can be widely deployed without losing performance or quality. This requires robust scaling strategies and a well-thought-out infrastructure. At the same time, companies should aim to increase productivity through continuous process optimizations and efficiency improvements. By implementing proven methods and leveraging best practices, companies can ensure that the technology is used successfully and productively in the long term.

The strategic implications of the Hype Cycle require companies to have a high degree of flexibility, adaptability, and foresight. From early engagement and risk management through managing expectations and collecting user feedback to scaling and sustainable productivity improvement, companies must carefully weigh and plan their actions. By taking a strategic approach, companies can overcome the challenges of the Hype Cycle and benefit from new technologies in the long term.

Synergies between the Hype Cycle and Crossing the Chasm

The Gartner Hype Cycle and Geoffrey Moore’s “Crossing the Chasm” models complement each other by highlighting different aspects of technology introduction and market adoption. The Hype Cycle describes the development and market adoption of new technologies in five phases, while the Chasm model emphasizes the critical transition between early adopters and the early majority. Together, these models provide valuable insights and can be combined to better understand and manage the complex journey of an innovation from concept to broad market acceptance.

Strategies to Bridge the Chasm in the Context of the Hype Cycle

1. Early Identification of the Chasm:
   Companies should recognize early when they are approaching the chasm. In the Hype Cycle, this often coincides with the transition from the Peak of Inflated Expectations to the Trough of Disillusionment. This moment is critical, as this is often where the discrepancy between the expectations of early adopters and the early majority is most apparent.
2. Market-Oriented Product Development:
   During the Trough of Disillusionment and on the Slope of Enlightenment, companies should focus on developing market-ready products. It is important to understand the needs and requirements of the early majority and incorporate these into product development. This means that features and functions appreciated by early adopters may need to be adjusted or expanded to convince the broader market.
3. Targeted Marketing and Sales Campaigns:
   In crossing the chasm, companies should develop targeted marketing and sales campaigns specifically aimed at the early majority. It is important to build trust and dispel concerns. Case studies and success stories from early adopters can serve as references to overcome the skepticism of the early majority.
4. Strategic Alliances and Partnerships:
   Collaborating with established companies can facilitate access to the early majority and provide additional resources. Partnerships can help strengthen market presence and gain the target audience’s trust. Established companies often bring the necessary credibility and reach that startups lack.

Practical Recommendations for Market Introduction and Scaling

1. Gradual Market Introduction:
   A staggered market introduction, starting with niche markets and gradually expanding to broader segments, can help bridge the chasm. Companies should rely on iterative feedback loops to continuously implement improvements based on user feedback.
2. Expectation Management:
   Clear communication of the technology’s potential and limitations helps manage inflated expectations. Companies should set realistic timelines and milestones to maintain credibility with investors and customers.
3. Utilizing Best Practices for Technology Assessment:
   Regular technology assessments and benchmarks are essential to objectively measure current status and progress. These evaluations should include both internal and external perspectives to get a comprehensive view of market maturity and acceptance.
4. Scalable Infrastructure:
   For successful scaling, companies must ensure that their infrastructure is robust and scalable. This includes not only technical aspects but also organizational structures and processes that must be flexible and adaptable to support growth.
5. Long-Term Planning and Vision:
   A clear long-term vision and strategic planning are crucial. Companies should not only aim for short-term successes but also focus on the sustainable development and market establishment of the technology. This includes continuous product development and adaptation as well as exploring new markets and applications.

Summary

Understanding the Gartner Hype Cycle is crucial for companies to realistically assess the maturity and potential of new technologies. The model helps anticipate the highs and lows of market acceptance and develop appropriate strategies.

The Hype Cycle, the Innovator’s Dilemma, and Moore’s concept together provide a comprehensive picture of technological development and market adoption. The Hype Cycle visualizes the phases of public perception and technological maturity. Moore’s model emphasizes the challenges that arise when bridging the chasm between early adopters and the early majority, while the Innovator’s Dilemma highlights the strategic decisions companies must make to promote disruptive technologies without jeopardizing their existing business areas.

Established companies facing the Innovator’s Dilemma can use the Hype Cycle to determine the right time to invest in disruptive technologies without jeopardizing their existing business models. At the same time, the Hype Cycle helps startups survive the transition from the phase of inflated expectations to the trough of disillusionment and achieve the necessary stability to overcome the chasm. This is particularly relevant concerning a startup’s financing strategy.

By using the Hype Cycle, companies can make more informed decisions about when and how to invest in new technologies to reach both early adopters and the early majority. This reduces the risk of bad investments and increases the likelihood of successfully bringing innovations to market. When the Hype Cycle, the Innovator’s Dilemma, and the concept of “Crossing the Chasm” are considered together, a comprehensive strategy emerges that enables companies to master the challenges of the innovation process and leverage the full potential of new technologies.

Outlook: Future Trends and Developments in Innovation Management

In an increasingly dynamic and technology-driven world, continuous adaptation and flexibility in innovation management are crucial. Future trends indicate that the pace of technological progress and the associated market changes will continue to increase. Therefore, companies must implement agile methods and adaptive strategies to respond quickly to new developments.

Another important trend is the growing significance of artificial intelligence and machine learning, which not only enable new products and services but also revolutionize innovation management itself. By using data analytics and predictive analytics, companies can early identify trends and make informed decisions about which technologies and innovations to pursue.

Additionally, the integration of sustainability and social responsibility into innovation strategies is becoming increasingly important. Companies that develop forward-looking solutions that consider ecological and social aspects will be better positioned in a competitive market.

Finally, successfully navigating the Hype Cycle and overcoming the “Chasm” requires a culture of continuous learning and experimentation. Companies should foster an open innovation culture where failures are seen as learning opportunities and where continuous adaptation to changing market conditions becomes the norm. Only in this way can they remain competitive in the long term and fully exploit the potential of new technologies.

Do you need help developing suitable strategies for your DeepTech startup? Feel free to contact us. We’ll be happy to help you. Would you like to learn more about (regenerative) business design? Then follow us on LinkedIn.